Alabama’s Redistricting Case Back Before SCOTUS And Honestly This Should Be A Lay-Up

Frankly, this emergency appeal to SCOTUS should be a lay-up. The appeals court’s ruling is beyond absurd. Either maps are being drawn without consideration of race, which is the proper course under the Constitution, or they’re not:

“Callais,” Bowdre continued, “vindicates Alabama’s position on the lawfulness of the 2023 Plan, yet the district court decided in one week that Callais changed nothing.” The district court, Bowdre stressed, did not require the challengers to offer alternative maps that would achieve

ADVERTISEMENT

←PreviousNext→